Nearly all who review the literature conclude that the role of invasive procedures to treat chronic pain is poorly characterized because of the lack of “definitive” studies. The overt nature of invasive treatments, along with the risks, technical skills, and costs involved create challenges to study them. However, these challenges do not completely preclude evaluating invasive procedure effectiveness and safety using well-designed methods. This article reviews the challenges of studying outcomes of invasive therapies to treat pain and discuss possible solutions. Although the following discussion can apply to most invasive therapies to treat chronic pain, it is beyond the scope of the article to individually cover every invasive therapy used. Therefore, most of the examples focus on injection therapies to treat spine pain, spinal cord stimulation, and intrathecal drug therapies.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author. Address: 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0898, La Jolla, CA 92093-0898. Tel.: 858-822-0776; fax: 858-534-7080. E-mail address: email@example.com (M. Wallace).
Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
Received May 07, 2018
Accepted August 07, 2018
© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The International Association for the Study of Pain.
Unique aspects of clinical trials of invasive therapies for chronic pain
Orginally Published At: PAIN Reports